📢 Updates on tourist licences in Andalusia: Join the WhatsApp channel →
WhatsApp|Contact|🇪🇸 Versión en español

DGSJyFP · 12 December 2025 · No. 278 · BOE-A-2026-5836 · Article 17.12 LPH · Notarised signatures

NRUA and lack of notarised signatures in the community authorisation: the DGSJyFP suspends the registration

Three formal requirements demanded by the DGSJyFP: identification of voters, current registry quotas, and notarised signatures.

Community agreement rejected on form?

Re-formalisation

SALAMA LEGAL SLP reformulates the agreement with notarised signatures and verified quorum.

⚖️ DGSJyFP Resolution · 12 December 2025 · BOE-A-2026-5836 · Resolution No. 278

NRUA and lack of notarised signatures in the community authorisation: the DGSJyFP suspends the registration

⚠️ UPDATE · 21 May 2026
The Spanish Supreme Court has annulled the Single Rental Registry (NRA) for lack of State competence, by judgment STS 620/2026. The doctrine described here may have changed.
👉 Technical analysis of the judgment · Practical implications
⚖️ Claim damages and loss of profit →

The DGSJyFP Resolution of 12 December 2025 —Resolution No. 278, BOE-A-2026-5836— consolidates the doctrine on the form of the community agreement required for the NRUA after Law 1/2025 (Article 17.12 LPH). The message is clear: an abstract agreement is not enough; the owners voting in favour must be nominally identified, must represent at least 3/5 of registry quotas in force at the moment of presentation, and their signatures must be notarised or ratified before the Registrar.

The three formal requirements

  1. Nominal identification of the voters: not enough to state a global figure; an annex with names, ID, registry quotas and signatures is required.
  2. Quorum based on current registry quotas: the 3/5 of Article 17.12 LPH is measured on the quotas in force at the moment of presentation to the Registry, not at the meeting.
  3. Notarial legitimation or ratification: the signatures of favourable owners must be notarised or ratified in person before the Registrar.
ℹ️ Why this rigour
The Article 17.12 LPH agreement does not stay internal: it generates a registry annotation with erga omnes effect. Registry principles of publicity and specificity demand the same rigour as for any other registrable act.

How to avoid suspension

  1. Meeting notice with specific agenda item (authorisation of tourist use under Article 17.12 LPH).
  2. Detailed minutes with nominal identification of each voter.
  3. Nominal annex signed by all favourable owners.
  4. Notarial legitimation of the signatures.
  5. Updated simple-note check before presentation.
⚠️ Most common mistake
Filing a secretary-administrator's certificate stating «approved by sufficient majority» without nominal annex or notarised signatures. Negative qualification is almost automatic.

Community agreement rejected on form?

SALAMA LEGAL SLP reformulates the agreement with notarised signatures and verified quorum.

FAQ

Is the administrator-secretary signature enough?

No, on its own. Nominal identification of voters and notarial legitimation or in-person ratification are required.

On which quotas is the 3/5 calculated?

On the registry quotas in force at the moment of presentation, not at the meeting.

What if new transmissions occur between meeting and Registry?

The new owners must be included in the consent or must expressly ratify it.

Legal notice: informative content, not personalised legal advice.